Find the right context.
Meeting notes, CRM record, files and emails: preparing a document often starts with a search across several tools.
io4 Agents · Automation & AI
io4 connects your tools and sets up automations and AI assistants tailored to your processes. To prepare a proposal, kick off a mandate or track a project, your team moves forward with the right information and the necessary approvals.
30 minutes, no commitment. You bring an example of recurring work. We show you a process we run at io4.
Your sources and rules, connected to the work to be done.
Illustrative diagram · The path is tailored to your company.
The work between your tools
The information exists. Yet your team still has to find it, re-key it and pass it along for the work to move forward.
Meeting notes, CRM record, files and emails: preparing a document often starts with a search across several tools.
A proposal is signed or a request is approved. What remains is to create the file, pass on the information and check the prerequisites.
To know a project's status, you have to cross-reference hours, deadlines, actions and billing.
We start from the steps, information and decisions in your process to choose what can be automated or assisted.
Five concrete starting points
From the first proposal to mandate tracking, pick the work that recurs at your place. Each example is tailored to your systems, your rules and your access.
01 · SELL
The agent reads the meeting transcript, pulls context from your CRM and rate card, then drafts the proposal in the right template: phased scope, estimate by role, exclusions.
Three hours of grunt work per proposal: finding the context, starting from an old document, re-typing prices and references by hand.
Account, contact and comparable proposals already delivered
Phased scope, estimate by role, quality check scored before handoff
The salesperson decides scope and price. Nothing goes out without them.
A complete proposal, consistent with the ones you've already delivered, ready to approve.
Explore the proposal solution →02 · DELIVER
As soon as the proposal is signed, the agent builds the kickoff file, then reconciles CRM, hours and billing to give the real status of each mandate and flag overruns.
Information gets lost between sales and delivery, and to track a file you then have to open several systems and redo the math by hand.
The client file and the real progress
Kickoff file, then overrun hours, missing invoice, client gone quiet
The lead confirms the kickoff and decides on the gaps
A mandate launched cleanly and tracked continuously: overruns are flagged early, not at the final invoice.
03 · ATTRACT
Every inbound request is enriched and scored against your criteria, routed to the right salesperson and followed up at the right time: no lead slips through the cracks.
Requests come in by email, form, phone. Some wait for days, others get lost, and no one knows which ones are worth following up.
Forms, emails and calls
Profile completed, scored by your rules, follow-ups scheduled
The salesperson focuses on qualified leads
Qualified, prioritized leads followed up on time: nothing slips through the cracks anymore.
04 · SERVE
The agent triages inbound requests, drafts a reply from your knowledge base and the client's history, and escalates to the right person the cases that warrant it.
Requests pile up in a shared inbox. People hunt for context, repeat the same answers, and urgent cases drown in the volume.
The client's full context
Priority, drafted reply, cases to escalate identified
Your team approves or takes over on sensitive cases
Replies ready and prioritized, clients served faster, complex cases escalated at the right time.
05 · PROCESS
Supplier invoices, purchase orders, contracts, forms: the agent reads the document, extracts the data and prepares it for your systems, with a check on doubtful cases.
Someone re-keys invoices and forms into the system by hand, one line at a time. Slow, repetitive, and a typo always slips in.
Invoices, contracts, forms
Data extracted, reconciled, discrepancies and duplicates flagged
Your team only decides on the exceptions
Data entered into your systems without manual re-keying, and exceptions flagged for review.
These use cases illustrate what's possible. Their scope and level of autonomy are defined during scoping.
The right level of automation
A single process can combine these three approaches. We keep the ones that serve your need, with the right controls.
Create a file, route an approval or update a system after validation.
Example: a complete request is sent to the designated manager.
Extract information, classify a request or prepare a document from several sources.
Example: a meeting summary is prepared for review.
Ask the right questions, build an answer step by step and flag inconsistencies.
Example: a complex proposal progresses section by section with your experts.
Classic automation may be enough. When AI is useful, the sources, controls and validation steps are defined with you. Exceptions are routed to the right people.
A real use case at io4
Finding the context, preparing the scope, filling the template and flagging the points to check: it's a process we use in our operations.
Results reported by io4 for its internal process: 12 proposals a week, prepared by a team of 3 salespeople. These gains apply to this process. Results on your files and other use cases are assessed during the pilot.
The agent prepares the work. The preparer fills in the missing information, decides on the commitments and reviews the document before sending.
The detailed case shows reconstructions with a fictional client, without exposing any client data.
Explore the io4 offering for proposalsWe also use automations to prepare mandate kickoffs and connect information across our management tools.
These use cases give the discussion a concrete starting point. Your process keeps its scope, its controls and its success criteria.
Your tools. Your way of working.
Microsoft 365, your CRM and your management tools remain the systems of record. We assess the possible connections and the actions needed before choosing the solution.
Your Microsoft usage
To build agents connected to your Microsoft sources and processes, with Power Platform connectors and flows.
Usage channels, licenses, access and actions are validated with your IT team.
The approach we use at io4
An option to leverage your documents, prepare content and support reasoning and writing tasks.
We use Claude for our own proposal process. The deployment model depends on the intended use.
Already using ChatGPT?
We assess your ChatGPT subscription, the available connections and the permitted actions to build a fitting approach.
Pro accounts or a shared environment: we check what your access allows and any additional integration needs.
Available features depend on the plan and the permitted connections. An event-triggered automation may require integration and billing separate from the subscription your teams use.
With your IT team we define the sources, permissions, data recipients, retention and the processing terms that apply to the chosen setup.
A first project that's useful and measurable
A good candidate recurs regularly, follows explainable steps, has accessible sources and an owner able to validate the result.
You bring an example. We look at the steps, the tools, the people involved and the volume of work.
30 minutes · no commitmentSources, rules, access, approvals, deliverables and success criteria are specified before the build.
Scoping workshop · 2 weeksA pilot group reviews the results, the exceptions, the time actually spent on the work and the usage costs.
Pilot and adjustmentsTraining, documentation and handover support the use and operation of the delivered scope.
Production and evolutionReference versions, templates and access can be part of the first project. This work is included in the scope and priced before it's done.
What the pilot must prove
Time: preparation, review, corrections and handling of exceptions.
Quality: missing information, omissions and rework needed.
Operation: delays between steps and usage cost at the expected volume.
The time freed up can be used to respond faster, improve deliverables or absorb more work. It does not automatically represent a cash saving.
Deliverables and budgets
The mandate specifies what will be delivered, the prerequisites and how the result is verified with your team.
Steps, triggers, responsibilities and approvals to fit your reality.
Required connections, reference documents and rules for the agreed scope.
Quality criteria, exception handling and approvals defined with your leads.
Pilot, agreed adjustments, training and documentation for use and operation.
To choose and price
Two workshops with your leads to move from an intention to a first delivery plan.
Fixed fee · 2 weeks
Credited toward the mandate if you proceed.
To put it in place
Automation, AI assistant or a combination of both: the four deliverables are tailored to the project defined with you.
Indicative range · time and materials capped
Scope, budget and schedule specified before signing.
Amounts are before tax, GST and QST extra. Subscriptions, model consumption and operating costs are separate. io4 commits to the means and deliverables defined in the statement of work.
Prepaid hour banks of 2,500 to 10,000 $ CA let you plan for adjustments, evolving connections and support. Interventions are agreed with you.
The estimate separates licenses, consumption, any hosting and maintenance. It's based on volume, document size, the chosen model and the planned follow-up, then verified in the pilot.
See the costed example for proposalsBefore we talk
Tools, access and the level of autonomy are discussed from your real process.
Yes, if some steps remain manual or if the work spans several systems. We first look at what your tools already allow and what's left to organize, connect or automate. License and integration needs are assessed separately.
We first aim to work with your existing tools. The possible connections, their limits and any prerequisites are checked during scoping.
The level of autonomy is set for each step. Some actions follow rules; others require approval. Sensitive decisions and exceptions are assigned to owners. An assistant can also stay fully interactive and guide the user.
The pilot tests results and exceptions on your cases. Checks and validations are chosen according to the consequences of an error. Uncertain points and missing information must be flaggable and reviewable. Human review remains necessary at the planned steps.
Your systems remain the systems of record, but the model receives the information needed for processing. With your IT team we document the authorized sources, permissions, recipients, retention and processing terms of the chosen solution.
Bring an example of work that recurs every week, even an imperfect one. We help you identify a first lead and the information needed to assess it. The initial conversation is no-commitment; the scoping workshop is a separate mandate.
Your first process
A proposal to prepare. A mandate to start. A request to get approved. A report to rebuild.
In 30 minutes, we review your example, show you a process we run at io4 and identify a first lead.
No commitment · Your process · An io4 demo